Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4713747" **My name is Detective Mussell. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene to a 2 bedroom, 1 bath Beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad, he is a very weathly man because his parents died in a freak bungy jump accident. His friends didnt like him very much. The suspects guilty of committing this crime are Kendra, Vera, and Felix to frame Alfredo and Gene. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.** ==== ** The most incriminating piece of evidence was the cola cups. The evidence was found near Felix's dead body. The test performed was finger print on the cola cups test. The results of the test were Felix and Kendra both touched Felix's cup. This connects the suspect to the crime because Felix and kendra could have put sleeping pills in the cup for him to fall asleep and fake his own death. ** ==== ==== ** The next piece of evidence collected was the fake blood. It was found in scene 8. The test performed was the powder study. The results of the test were that the blood was fake and was made fromcornstrach and food dye. This connects the suspect to the crime because the fake blood could have been placed by Kendra and Vera to make it look like Felix is dead but he really is just asleep. ** ==== ==== ** Another piece of evidence collected was the secret note. It was found inn scene 8. The test performed was the secret note test. The results of the test were kendra wrote the note. This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra wrote it to make it seem that Gene and Alfredo where involved in the "death" of Felix. (How would they have looked guilty if she signed it, "Love Vera?) ** ==== ==== ** According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. First, Kendra put sleeping pills in Felix's cup. (What evidence do you have that sleeping pills were the used?) Next, Felix called in Alfredo to drink cola with him. Then, Alfredo went to the bathroom and when he came back he saw Felix "dead." Lastly, Alfredo called for help from Kendra, Vera and Gene then called 911. Felix woke up in the ambulance and disappeared. ** ==== ==== ** Therefore, Felix, Kendra and Vera committed the crime of Felix's "death" for Gene and Alfredo to go to jail because they never were really Felix's freinds, they just wanted the money if he died. ** ====  **Rubric for Podcasts**  introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 84% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __** The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || **__The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __**Conclusion summarizes information.**__  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 48/57